CONTACT DesignMarks.biz for innovative branding and identity.
DisclaimerPlease note that the views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of the blog owner DesignMarks.biz. The ruminations, and opinions expressed in this blog, and in any blog articles hereto before, or hereafter published, are solely those of each of the authors. They are not approved by, reflective of, or edited by the institutions of which I am affiliated, nor by persons affiliated thereof. This blog is an expression by the author(s) to generate discussion, awareness, and interest in the marketing, branding, advertising, and creative services process, and the search for knowledge in these areas. Any republication, or quotation of the expressions made herein by the author(s) is strictly prohibited without written permission of said author(s).
Lewis R. Elin
Lewis R. Elin Consulting
Bruce Glassner Creative Services
George S. Pavlik, Attorney
Husch Blackwell LLP
Powell Photography, Inc.
Better Life Systems
- Nate will be displaying several of his Lincoln Park series paintings @ Creative Coworking in Evanston, 922 Davis St… twitter.com/i/web/status/8… 3 months ago
- © 1963-2016 by DesignMarks Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of this document (images, photos, illustrations, and text contained on this website) may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of DesignMarks Corporation.
A number of lawsuits are filed every year asserting liability in connection with comparative advertisements. In one recently filed case, for example, H&R Block filed a complaint in Missouri federal court against Intuit, Inc., the provider of the do-it-yourself tax preparation software Turbo Tax®. The complaint includes allegations of unfair competition and trademark infringement arising out of Turbo Tax® television ads which allegedly include an unauthorized display of H&R Block’s trademark and false representations as to the quality of H&R Block’s tax preparation services. (Case No. 13-cv-00072). Specifically, the complaint alleges that the television ads suggest that Turbo Tax® is used and trusted by more than all other office tax preparation services combined, that H&R Block hires seasonal tax preparers with no experience and that such employees are not adequately trained or credentialed. Although these claims have not yet been decided, Intuit’s alleged comparative ads did not go unnoticed by H&R Block and have resulted in potential legal exposure.
George S. Pavlik
This entry was posted in Branding, Business, Design, Marketing and tagged Advertising, Advertising and Marketing, Brand, branding, Business, Business and Economy, Business Services, Business-to-business, Competition, Consulting, Design, Designer, Marketing, Marketing and Advertising, Niche market, Small business, smart business, Target audience, Target market, Television advertisement. Bookmark the permalink.